Nothing
The Global Environmental Facility and World Bank provide sufficient financial assistance to developing countries already. The developed countries should reiterate that these organizations are funded well enough and that it is time for developing countries to commit to fighting climate change. After all, climate change will disproportionately impact developing countries more than developed countries.
As the president of the United States crafting national and international strategies for dealing with climate change, you have made a series of decisions. Let's analyze the implications of each of your choices.
First, you decided to simply announce a new set of carbon emissions goals instead of advocating for concrete policy change. This decision will not help the US combat climate change as the goals you have set are unenforceable. Lobbyists, NGOs, scientists, and the international community are sick of toothless political statements and view your attempt at domestic leadership on climate change as a failure.
Second, you chose to pursue an international agreement on climate change. Your strategy to get developing countries on board without additional assistance was unsuccessful as many countries such as China, India, and Brazil expressed concern over the long-term economic costs of mitigating climate change. Unfortunately, you were unable to coalesce the international community towards a comprehensive solution to climate change.
Overall, you have done a poor job. You did not make any meaningful progress with regards to domestic energy policy. Furthermore, you were unable to foster a multilateral response to climate change. As the threat of climate change looms large, the international community must band together and act before it is too late.